Is book banning a valid means of protecting mental health?
Caroline Kunz
Dr. Ellis
EN 499
18 March 2024
Banning Books vs. Protecting Mental Health
This week's readings were incredibly beneficial in expanding my knowledge on the history of book banning, and the detriments that it continues to have on readers of all ages - especially those that are young. First, Mullally's piece provided jarring context to the issue of book banning, reminding us that the act of banning a book is a direct violation of our first amendment rights that forbid the censorship of literature. This notion makes more troubling the fact that parents, libraries, and schools continue to report books to be banned in order to fulfill their "moral obligation" to "protect the children in our schools from this moral danger as surely as from physical and medical dangers" (Mullally 2). What I cannot seem to understand is how these books can possibly be looked upon as "dangerous," when they contain real-life historical events, real life identities, and real life issues. And, how can exposure to these aspects of everyday life harm children? At the end of the day, these texts are there to educate, represent, and uplift young readers.
After gaining more context on the issue with Mullally's piece, I found Ringel's piece to be powerful in demonstrating the personal, real-world impacts of book banning and its ability to marginalize children. An overarching question that our class has discussed several times is, why do parents ban books in the first place? Ringel notes that often, parents ban books that "may be 'emotionally inappropriate' for children" (Ringel 4). She brings up an interesting point that "adults want to minimize children's anxiety, and schools are often under intense social and financial pressure to maintain established standards" (4). Thus, the question poses itself: is protecting childrens' mental health a valid reason for banning a book? In my opinion, banning books has the complete opposite effect. In my own experience as a young student and reader, being able to see myself represented and mirrored by characters in books made me feel incredibly happy and valued. Further, in reading of issues of racism, sexism, and homophobia in books, that might not apply to me personally, never once did I feel my mental health or wellbeing threatened - instead, I felt a greater sense of empathy and compassion, and a strong urge to stand against these issue in my own school community. In taking representation for all students away by banning books that we deem "inappropriate," we inhibit all readers from experiencing this joy. Moreover, in the words of Ringel, "when we say 'this book is inappropriate,' we're telling those children, 'your situation...your family...your life is inappropriate" (Ringel 5). In other words, when a book is banned, the students who may have been able to see themselves represented in it are made to feel ashamed of their race, gender, sexuality, ability, ethnicity, etc. This is incredibly damaging to students' self esteem and mental health. Thus, parents, schools, librarians, and teachers should reconsider their reasoning when claiming that banning a book will protect the mental health and wellbeing of all children.
Comments
Post a Comment